With so many consumers spending so much time in social media and expecting so much of brands, our investments in social will continue to grow, but that does not mean our results will grow, at least in easily measurable ways. Certainly, all of our brands will earn more fans, see more comments and collect more retweets, but we all know this is no longer enough--our bosses want to know the business results we are delivering, and fans simply are not a business benchmark.
Success in 2013, more than ever, will be measured in difficult metrics and not easy ones, and increasingly, it will come not just from the Marketing department but from every corner of the enterprise. To succeed in 2013 and beyond, organizations must recognize how social media is altering the way we live, work and conduct business and not just the way we kill time on Facebook.
Here is where (I believe) social will grow and where it will stumble and stagnate in 2013:
- Stagnate: Number of Social Media Users: Social networking has seen explosive growth in the past decade, but that is ending. It has to, since the point of saturation is nearing. In 2005, just eight percent of US online adults participated in social networking; by 2008, that number had grown to 35%; and today it is 69%. The slowing growth in new users will, for a moment, feed the doubts of some senior executives (who are part of the 50-to-64 crowd of which little over half use social media) that social media is more distraction than it is imperative. This attitude would be wrong, of course, which is why we need to focus not on users but...
Grow: Social Media Usage: The growth in the number of users may slow, but the way users adopt social media into their lives will not. Nielsen/NM Incite tells us that total time spent on social media in the U.S. across PCs and mobile devices increased 37% to 121 billion minutes (230,060 years!) in July 2012, compared to 88 billion in July 2011. People may be multitasking more than ever--40% of us use our phone or tablet while watching TV--but that does not mean that social media's growth is not coming at the expense of other media consumption activities...
- Grow: Social and Digital Media Pushes Aside Other Media: Especially in younger demographics, media consumption habits are shifting considerably and show no signs of stopping. comScore data demonstrates that the time spent with web-based email by 18-to-24 year olds declined 34% in the last year and nearly 50% since 2010. Even TV viewership is being affected; the 18-to-24 group watched a weekly average of 22 hours and 32 minutes of traditional TV in Q2 2012, about 1 hour and 45 minutes less than they did the year before. Meanwhile, although online video viewing is still eclipsed by TV, it is growing rapidly; the 18-to-24 folks watched one hour and 45 minutes of online video per week in 2012, a 75% increase in a single year. As for print, it continues to shrink--as Newsweek publishes its final print edition, it is time to consider what it means that Americans now spend more time staring at mobile screens than magazines and newspapers.
- Grow: Second-Tier Social Networks (But Who Cares?) Growth of the "big three" social networks is slowing (Facebook and LinkedIn had no growth in desktop visitors in the past year and Twitter's growth was just 13%), but sites like Pinterest, Google+ and Tumblr are still collecting new visitors. If you are in one of the few industries that has a clear strategic interest in social networks such as these, that is good news, but most brands should greet this news with nothing more than casual interest. Within most industry verticals, there are few scalable use cases and precious few case studies for marketing programs on Pinterest, Google+ and Tumblr. (For example, I recently researched what success financial services firms are having on Pinterest and found none.) Unless something notable changes in 2013, I see little reason to do anything more than experiment on these second-tier social networks.
-
Grow: Mobile Social Media (and Mobile Everything Else): It is no secret that mobile adoption continues to explode, and along with it so does social media usage. The big three social networks may have seen little to no growth in visitors from PCs in the past 12 months, but all three have experienced growth of 85% to 140% in visitors from mobile apps and mobile web sites in the same period. In addition, while Foursquare has not been quite as talkable in 2012 as in prior years, it is still experiencing triple-digit annual growth of its mobile app. (Many of you may be surprised to learn that, as of July of this year, Foursquare's mobile app had a larger audience than either Google+ or Pinterest.) In fact, despite privacy concerns around checking in, comScore found that one-third of smartphone users have shared their location with a retailer. All of this points to more SoLoMo marketing and service in 2013, and that means brands with physical locations have to continue to not simply have a local presence in social networks but drive more meaningful local engagement.
- Stagnate: Earned Media on Facebook: Getting people to pay attention to your brand on Facebook will get harder without opening your pocketbook. The issue, believe it or not, is not with Facebook--it's your brand. What makes your brand interesting, engaging and shareable? Why would your brand earn enough EdgeRank with people to be as worthwhile as their own friends? While Mark Cuban may complain, what is it that we expect Facebook to do about it? As marketers, we may want EdgeRank tweaked to show more brands in users' news feeds, but as users, does that sound appealing? (How often have you or one of your friends said, "You know, I just want to see more brands and less friends in my news feed"?) Brands must continue to maintain a presence on Facebook because our customers expect it, but increasingly attention will shift to paid media (or, more appropriately, to how paid, earned and owned media work together.) Of course, opening your pocketbook and buying media is hardly a guarantee of success on Facebook...
- Grow (But the Jury Remains Out): Paid Media on Facebook: While some studies have shown Facebook advertising can be effective, many marketers are still struggling to measure it. In a recent Ad Age study, one-third of marketers either did not know or said Facebook is not useful in building purchase intent, and over half felt it was only somewhat useful. Moreover, advertising success on Facebook may be harder to achieve as the year progresses--with modest user growth, little ability (or willingness) to increase ad presence on the platform and more marketers increasing their budgets, Facebook ad prices will rise. Success will require ever more complex targeting and measurement, such as retargeting, CRM targeting by email address or phone number, View Tags, improved first-party data collection and segmentation and custom segmentation from third-party providers to reach influencers on Facebook. There is a cottage industry exploding to help marketers spend their Facebook budget more effectively--check out the long list of Facebook advertising partners--and 2013 will be the year to start separating the wheat from the chaff.
- Grow (in Fits and Starts): Big Data: I have seen many year-end predictions that 2013 will be the year that social helps "Big Data" succeed. I do not believe it, not because I doubt the promise of Big Data but because it seems apparent the road to Big Data success will be a long one. The current hype and optimism for Big Data reminds me of the exuberance we saw for ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) in recent decades, but success with ERP implementations has come slowly and with many failures. Even now, twenty years after Gartner coined the term "ERP," we still see high-profile ERP failures that cost hundreds of millions of dollars. Big Data is not a system you merely switch on and see results; it will take time, care, investment, and incremental improvement to turn petabytes of data into useful knowledge that drives business success.
- Shrink: Bad Social Media Research: Increasingly, when I speak to peers within the discipline of social media, I am hearing frustration about the amount of bad research being shared. Blogs, podcasts and YouTube may have democratized the mass broadcast of information, but they also opened the door to every Tom, Dick and Harry to misreport, misinterpret or misrepresent data. We continue to see ridiculous "what is the value of a fan" studies and blog posts, even though it has been long evident that fans are a means to an end and not the end itself. Having 4.5 million fans did not prevent Dippin' Dots from declaring bankruptcy, nor did Best Buy's 6.5 million fans (and its widely praised Twelpforce Twitter program) prevent the company from being one of the worst stock performers of 2012, losing more than 50% of its value. From analysis that confuses cause and effect to studies that rely on the self-awareness of consumers to biased surveys, there is an astounding amount of bad information being disseminated. I sense social media professionals are growing tired of it, and I think this is the year where we see gravitation toward fewer information sources that we trust. This may be more wish than prediction on my part, but if you join me, we can make it happen!
-
Growing: Consumer Expectations of Social Customer Service: Increasingly, the reason to be in social media (to paraphrase John F. Kennedy) is not because of what your fans can do for you but what you can do for your fans. Social media is becoming a customer service channel of choice for many customers. Almost one in five consumers have used social media at least once in the last year to obtain a customer service response. Not only are the number of customers expecting service in social media rising, so are their expectations: One recent study found that 42% of consumers who post a service request to a brand via social media expect a response within 60 minutes, and 57% expect the same response time at night and on weekends as during normal business hours. Unsurprisingly, the stakes continue to rise for brands; an American Express study found that consumers tell an average of 15 people about positive experiences – up 67% from last year--and tell an average of 24 people about poor experiences – up 50% from 2011. Given this data, it is baffling to see a company like Charter Communications announce it is disbanding its social media customer service team and shuttering its customer service profiles in social media. A Charter representative stated, “We believe speaking directly with a customer is a more personal, effective and consistent way to answer questions," which demonstrates both an astounding lack of understanding of social media and a remarkable arrogance in believing that companies have the power to decide which service channels customers prefer. My prediction: All brands will be beefing up customer service in social media in 2013, and Charter will be back furnishing service via Twitter and Facebook before long.
- Exploding: Social Business: Almost everything I have included in this blog post thus far is the appetizer to this, the main course: Social business models may still be nascent, but they are exploding at a spectacular rate. As I have written in 2012, social is not just changing the way we communicate but the way we conduct business. The evolution of the Web followed a similar path over the past 15 years--the Internet altered not just the way we gather information but the way we make product decisions (search, ratings and reviews), purchase items (ecommerce) and use products (digital downloads, ebooks, streaming video, digital photos, etc.) Social media is already doing the same thing to certain industries, and I expect 2013 will be the year more companies take notice:
- P2P Lending: Midway through 2012, Lending Club and Prosper, the two leading peer-to-peer (P2P) loan services, surpassed $1 billion of loans issued since their founding. Lending Club, the larger of the two, issued $88 million in loans in November 2012, an increase of 200% over its November 2011 volume, and--in a sign of how P2P models will soon challenge traditional banking--the firm recently added Larry Summers, former World Bank VP and US Treasury Secretary, to its board of directors.
- Car sharing continues to grow, albeit more slowly than P2P lending; Zipcar's stock was battered after its last quarterly report announced it "only" had year-to-year membership growth of 21%. Meanwhile, virtually all the major car manufacturers and car rental agencies are making their own investments in car sharing models, including General Motors, Ford, Toyota, Enterprise and Hertz. We Americans love our cars, so change here will come slow and steady. Don't expect a "hockey stick" moment for car sharing in 2013, just more growth that chips away at traditional car ownership habits.
Space sharing: Airbnb continues its rapid growth, allowing people to rent out homes and rooms to others. In June, the company announced the number of guest nights booked had grown from 5 million to 10 million in less than six months, and recently CEO Brian Chesky was quoted saying that by the end of 2012, Airbnb would be filling more room nights than Hilton Hotels. Meanwhile, mobile continues to be a huge growth driver, with 26% of Airbnb’s overall traffic coming from mobile devices (compared to only 12% last year) and downloads of its iOS app increasing 80% over the past three months.
- Other Collaborative Consumption Models: Social business does not stop at cash loans, autos and places to sleep. A great deal of experimentation is underway, including P2P parking, home-cooked meals, chores, free stuff, home goods and rides. Sure, these businesses are small, but ecommerce in 2000 was less than one percent of total US retail; twelve years later ecommerce accounts for five percent, a small percentage of retail in the US but more than enough to knock former giants like Kodak and Borders into bankruptcy. What will happen as these P2P business models continue to grow and chip away at existing business models? In 2013, watch for larger numbers of traditional companies to increase their experimentation and investments to hedge their bets for the future growth of social business.
Do you think my forecasts for 2013 are correct or all washed up? I would welcome your dialog--both criticism and agreement--in the comments below or on Twitter (where my handle is @augieray.)
14 comments:
Very comprehensive. In general I would align with you. It is a natural evolution of what has been unfolding the last few years. Social Media is but another tool in the brand's toolkit, and the newest and least understood, and for the majority of brands will not be in the top 5 as it relates to business value.
Some brands are just not that interesting and no matter what, they likely will never be. Not to say an occasional promotional moment won't get noticed, but passion usually cannot be mas-produced and is certainly difficult to sustain.
Additionally not all brands use all media. Most brands don't advertise on TV, yet nearly all their customers watch TV.
Mobile is becoming like the web of 2001. It is disappearing. It's no longer a thing. It is part of the fabric of connection. Hand held devices are so popular because humans have a powerful, primal connection between our brain and our hands. The device is the syringe and apps are the drugs. Convergence will continue and the edges between what we used to think about, desktop and mobile, will vanish.
Brands should focus on this convergence, not social.
Thanks for the great comment, Steve. I agree convergence is important, and I like the way you talk about mobile, social and digital being the fabric. I am beginning to think of social like the air--it's around us, we move in it, breath it, cannot live without it, and it's there whether we are aware of it or not.
Still, I think with the growth in social, brands cannot simply accept that they are not that interesting. They have to stop thinking about content strategies to get people talking and start DOING and BEING something that gets people talking!
One thing you don't mention is there impact of a single sign on method, like using your FB or LI userid to connect and comment in sites where you are not a member. Also, being able to repost from a site where you are not a member to ones you belong to creates a new dynamic - a temporal social graph across social media nodes. HufPost comments posted to FB pages is a good example
First, thanks for a great post. It really got the blood pumping and the wheels turning.
But I need help with the whole concept of 'social business'. I've heard the term bounced around but never wrapped my head around what the heck it is.
Regarding your examples, giving money away isn't success - getting the loans repaid on time and generating a profit is. And I have seen a lot of start ups with 'rapid growth' because going from $0 to $10,000 in revenue produces an attention grabbing % - but, again, unless you have the same funding as Amazon, you better turn a profit ASAP.
Happy Holidays!
Pat
sylviechen, the way people now use Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter and other profiles as a single signon is certainly powerful and interesting, but I'm not sure it's a growing trend any more. I could be wrong, however--do you know of any good data on this?
Thanks for the comment!
patmcgraw,
Thanks for the comment.
First, as for what Social Business is or is not, there are a lot of different views on the meaning of this term. In fact, I'll admit that my definition (new forms of business empowered by social technologies where consumers bypass traditional providers to acquire more directly from individuals) is different than many others' definition. Too many people, in my opinion, use "Social Business" as a trash can term that encompasses everything and anything social. I see it differently, and I wrote a blog post about this: http://www.experiencetheblog.com/2011/11/what-is-social-business.html
As for making money, I certainly agree, but don't overlook that Amazon did not make dollar one of profit for SIX YEARS. Today, Jeff Bezos is one of the richest men in the world while companies that were making money at the time (such as Borders) are now defunct. There can be WAY too much focus on making money today rather than focusing on how you build a business that makes money in the future.
That said, many of the older social businesses I cite are making money already. Zipcar has been in the black three of the last five quarters. While many others are still pre-IPO, there is great evidence that people who lend money via P2P sites are making a solid return. 91.11% of Lending Club investors with 800+ Notes earn returns between 6% and 18%. (800 Notes can be purchased with a minimum investment of $20,000.) https://www.lendingclub.com/info/statistics.action
Thanks for the dialog!
Augie
Very thought provoking - I am unsure how your example of Zipcar (soon to be owned by Avis) fits into your social business model. This has more to do with the different business model engineered by a innovative company than social. The contribution of social is spreading news about 'good' products/services. New business models will gather pace, simply because it is so much easier to create word of mouth.
I believe that is the ultimate role of social - Facebook and Twitter are just pipes that connect people. Businesses need to learn how to use these pipes just as they learned to use TV, newspapers and yellow pages.
I also agree free posts (Facebook)are a thing of the past - forget Edgerank games - if Facebook makes it easier for brands to manipulate - it dies.
Terry,
I agree Zipcar isn't a pure P2P model, but I think it does represent a sort of collaborative consumption. I see these models as a result of our increasingly more social world, even if they aren't pure P2P plays. The idea that I can rent/access something rather than own it is all part of the way digital and social is profoundly changing attitudes.
I don't think Word of Mouth is going anywhere, but I think 1) it's always been with us, and 2) it isn't nearly as powerful a disruptive force in business as are P2P and collective consumption models. The internet changed how we marketed and communicated, but it's MUCH larger impact is in how we purchase items. Borders, Blockbuster and Kodak didn't lose because they didn't get how to launch web sites and use email; they lost because they ignored how the Web was altering human behaviors. I think social will do the same thing to companies that only think social media is impacting WOM and not products and services themselves.
Thanks for the dialog!
Great post Augie. Very thoughtful predictions and I think we will see many come true. I keep coming back to content which in itself is tricky - we need compelling content to prove what social can do - but we need to be able to prove social's capability and real business results to invest in content creation. Will be an exciting year to see where everyone takes their social programs.
Thanks Vanessa,
I agree content is very important, but I also think it's becoming a crutch to too many brands. "We can't or won't become talkable by creating a great product or service experience, so instead we'll try to get people talking with content."" Obviously, having great content and having a great product and service experience are not mutually exclusive, but if a brand was going to focus on one thing first, it should be product and service.
I think of it this way: How did you first learn about Amazon? Google? iPads? Was it from ads or content? Or was it from friends buzzing about a great new product or service? If brands put as much effort into creating experiences that go people talking as they do into Facebook sweepstakes and content plans, I suspect they'd have a great deal more success.
thanks for a great article Augie.
Thanks, David. I appreciate the comment!
Very good point Augie. My comment assumed the great customer experience was already in place - but a good item to point out. Definitely see how content can become the crutch.
Post a Comment